Cases 1 - 10 of 101
Samuelson v. Masterson et al
as 4:2023cv01061
Petitioner:
Michael Dean Samuelson
Respondent:
Scott Masterson, Russ Authier, Officer FNU Ramirez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Samuelson v. Masterson et al
as 1:2023cv01259
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Samuelson
Defendant:
Scott Masterson, Russ Authier, FNU Ramirez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-50156
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv01299
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tello v. Rayford
as 3:2022cv06050
Plaintiff:
Gilberto Tello
Defendant:
J. Rayford, R. Boyd, Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jean-Pierre Ronet v. Heston Silbert, et al
as 22-15942
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEAN-PIERRE RONET
Defendant / Appellee:
HESTON SILBERT, Director, STEPHEN MORRISON, Administrative Service Manager, Arizona Department of Public Safety, in his official and individual capacity, DANIEL KILEY, Judge-Superior Court and others
Ronet v. Arizona Department of Public Safety et al
as 2:2021cv01677
Plaintiff:
Jean-Pierre Ronet
Defendant:
Arizona Department of Public Safety, Heston Stibert, Stephen Morrison and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Michael Spengler v. Los Angeles Sheriffs et al
as 2:2020cv03615
Defendant:
T.T.C.F.- Tower Two Clinic, Mr. Bebon, Mr. Iwig and others
Plaintiff:
Michael R. Spengler and Michael Spengler, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Krist v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2020cv00129
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and League Medical Concepts
Plaintiff:
Joseph CM Krist, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Boyle v. Barnett
as 4:2020cv00188
Plaintiff:
James Franklin Boyle
Defendant:
Kriste Barnett and Kriste Burnett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
