Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Fredrick Canady v. Huneycutt
as 22-7344
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FREDRICK L. CANADY
Defendant / Appellee:
HUNEYCUTT, Warden, MARILYN GAMEWELL and L. HUFFMAN
Canady v. Huneycutt et al
as 5:2022cv00082
Plaintiff:
Fredrick L. Canady
Defendant:
FNU Huneycutt, Marilyn M. Gamewell and L. Huffman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Huffman v. Brooks
as 3:2021cv00423
Defendant:
FNU Brooks
Plaintiff:
Dann L. Huffman and Danny L. Huffman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anthony Mack v. Edmund Brown, Jr., et al
as 12-17347
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY EDWARD MACK
Defendant - Appellee:
EDMUND G. BROWN, Jr., Governor of California, KAMALA HARRIS, State Attorney General, STEVEN C. WOLAN, Public Defender and others
Mack v. Brown et al
as 4:2012cv02517
Plaintiff:
Anthony E. Mack
Defendant:
Edmund G. Brown, Kamala Harris, Steven C. Wolan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Farrakhan v. Johnson et al
as 7:2011cv00185
Defendant:
K. Austin, Sgt. Baily, Mrs. Ball and others
Plaintiff:
Shaka Amir Farrakhan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robert Yeager v. A.J. Hardy, et al
as 11-10189
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT TERRELL YEAGER
Defendant - Appellee:
A. J. HARDY, Capt., JANICE HOPKINS, Assistant Warden, BURNS and others
Yeager v. Hardy et al (INMATE2)
as 2:2010cv00896
Plaintiff:
Robert Terrell Yeager
Defendant:
A. J. Hardy, Janice Hopkins, Sgt. Burns and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Zachary Cooper, Sr. v. J. Dooley
as 10-7226
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ZACHARY COOPER, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
J. DOOLEY, Counselor, CORDLE, Counselor, D. VASS, Treatment Program Supervisor and others
Farrakhan v. Johnson et al
as 1:2010cv00924
Plaintiff:
Shaka Amir Farrakhan
Defendant:
Gene Johnson, J. Jabe, Stevens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
