Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Yates #619169 v. Rogers et al
as 2:2018cv00180
Defendant:
Unknown Rogers and Lisa Belanger
Plaintiff:
Christopher L. Yates #619169
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Yates v. Attorney General, State of Florida et al
as 6:2015cv01759
Petitioner:
Russell L. Yates
Respondent:
Attorney General, State of Florida and Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Restricted filer return unfiled any papers in violation of court order v. Superintendent
as 3:2015cv00054
Petitioner:
Corey L Yates
Respondent:
Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Yates v. Superintendent
as 3:2013cv00319
Petitioner:
Corey L Yates
Respondent:
Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
YATES v. LEAVENHAGEN
as 1:2013cv00537
Respondent:
MARK LEAVENHAGEN
Petitioner:
COREY L. YATES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jacori Carter v. D. Farmer
as 12-7625
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JACORI ANDRE CARTER
Defendant - Appellee:
D. FARMER, Correctional Officer, JOHNNY HALL, Correctional Officer and CHRISTOPHER GILBERT, Sergeant
Defendant:
NURSE MEADE, LPN, TONY ADAMS, Investigator Sgt., TRACEY RAY, Warden and others
Carter v. Farmer et al
as 7:2012cv00008
Defendant:
Tony Adams, Nurse A. Bowens, D. Farmer and others
Plaintiff:
Jacori Andre Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. Farmer et al
as 1:2011cv00979
Plaintiff:
Jacori Andre Carter
Defendant:
D. Farmer, Johnny Hall, Christopher Gilbert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
YATES v. LEVANHAGEN
as 1:2011cv00834
Respondent:
MARK LEVANHAGEN
Petitioner:
COREY L. YATES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Melvin Maddox v. Gene Johnson
as 10-7081
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MELVIN COREY MADDOX
Defendant - Appellee:
GENE M. JOHNSON, FRED SHILLING, TRACY S. RAY and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
