Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Joshua Jones v. Amy Johnson, et al
as 22-3260
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Joshua Jones
Defendant / Appellee:
Amy D. Johnson, Judge, 15th Division, 6th Circuit Court, Riley Sheridan Cauley, Attorney, Karen Whatley, Judge, 6th Division Court and others
Jones v. Gibson et al
as 4:2022cv01027
Defendant:
Chasity McWhorter, John Gibson, Edna Gibson and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua L Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joshua Jones v. Chasity Jones, et al
as 22-2806
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Joshua Jones
Defendant / Appellee:
Chasity Jones, Anderson Pointe, Tracy Lounsbury and others
Lounsbury v. Williams et al
as 1:2022cv01911
Petitioner:
Dale Loren Lounsbury
Respondent:
J. F. Williams and Michael Carvajal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jones v. Johnson et al
as 4:2022cv00536
Plaintiff:
Joshua L Jones
Defendant:
Amy D Johnson, Riley Sheridan Cauley, Keran Whatley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Jones et al
as 4:2022cv00402
Plaintiff:
Joshua Jones
Defendant:
Chasity Jones, Anderson Pointe, Tracy Lounsbury and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lounsbury v. Premo
as 6:2013cv01935
Petitioner:
Michael Ray Lounsbury
Respondent:
Jeff Premo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lounsbury v. Darr et al
as 1:2012cv00362
Plaintiff:
Kara Lounsbury
Defendant:
Douglas Darr, Douglas (I) Darr, Melanie Gregory and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PARSONS v. CANNON et al
as 1:2010cv00040
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY ALLEN PARSONS
Defendant:
KENT W. CANNON, FRANCISCO J. QUINTANA, HARRELL WATTS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Lounsbury v. State of Oregon
as 3:2009cv06147
Petitioner:
Michael Lounsbury
Defendant:
State of Oregon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
