Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Austin v. Rodriguez et al
as 1:2024at00410
Plaintiff:
Jasmyne M. Austin
Defendant:
R Rodriguez, V Ramolete, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Austin v. Mullens et al
as 7:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
Sage M. Austin
Defendant:
B. Mullens, Dotson and Warden of Wallen's Ridge State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Austin v. Mullens et al
as 1:2024cv00178
Plaintiff:
Sage M. Austin
Defendant:
B. Mullens, Dotson and Warden of Wallen's Ridge State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murzike v. Green et al
as 3:2023cv00075
Plaintiff:
James T. Murzike
Defendant:
R. Green, Sgt. Rulevitch, C.O. Mattox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Nevada Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2021cv00304
Plaintiff:
David Thompson
Defendant:
Nevada Department of Corrections, Steve Sisolak, Aaron Ford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Austin v. Estes et al
as 4:2019cv01972
Defendant:
Specks, I-I Investigation, Estes and others
Plaintiff:
Charles M Austin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Hininger et al
as 4:2017cv00075
Plaintiff:
Damion Brown
Defendant:
Damon Hininger, Christopher LaRose, Dennis Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Broadhead v. Carter et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2016cv00711
Plaintiff:
James M. Broadhead
Defendant:
M. Strickland, R. Butler, M. Laman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Broadhead v. Palmer et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2016cv00529
Plaintiff:
James M. Broadhead
Defendant:
Milton Palmer, Timothy Scott, V. Baldwin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Broadhead v. Fitzpatrick et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2016cv00484
Plaintiff:
James M. Broadhead
Defendant:
T. Fitzpatrick, S. Halliam, M. Palmer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
