Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Daniel Roger Hood v. Warden of the San Quentin State Prison in the State of California et al
as 2:2024cv03577
Plaintiff:
Daniel Roger Hood
Defendant:
Warden of the San Quentin State Prison in the State of California, Judge Blaine K. Bowman, District Attorney Keith Watanabe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. BIRKHEAD et al
as 1:2024cv00165
Plaintiff:
BRANDON OTHA MARTIN
Defendant:
CHARLES F. BIRKHEAD, M. SPENCER, GLASSCOCK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Allen v. Matteson et al
as 2:2023cv01405
Plaintiff:
Columbus Allen, Jr.
Defendant:
G. Matteson, M. Spencer and R. O'Brien
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv21531
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Coram Nobis
Sherrill v. Spencer (Marion County)
as 8:2022cv01036
Plaintiff:
Niketa Lashun Sherrill
Defendant:
M. Spencer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spencer v. Rivera
as 2:2020cv00741
Respondent:
Rosie Rivera
Not Classified By Court:
Prisoner Litigation Unit and Dean M. Spencer
Petitioner:
Clinton Dean Spencer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
(PC) Hayes v. Spencer et al
as 2:2020cv00680
Defendant:
M. Spencer, J. Giottonini, M. Burkhart and others
Plaintiff:
Conroy J. Hayes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Spencer et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2019cv00694
Defendant:
Karla Jones, C. Bryant and M. Spencer
Plaintiff:
Charles Eugene Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reid v. Spencer et al
as 3:2018cv50248
Defendant:
M. Spencer, John Varga, Wexford Health Source, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Ryan Reid
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hofer v. Spencer et al
as 1:2018cv00122
Plaintiff:
Joseph A. Hofer
Defendant:
Brett M. Spencer, C. David Kelly, Kristopher Blanton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
