Cases 1 - 10 of 66
Rodriguez Then v. US
as 24-1120
Petitioner:
LUIS MANUEL RODRIGUE THEN and LUIS MANUEL RODRIGUEZ THEN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01612
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. United States of America
as 3:2023cv03793
Petitioner:
Carlos Manuel Rodriguez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Rodriguez v. United States of America
as 3:2023cv00427
Petitioner:
Carlos Manuel Rodriguez
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Then v. USA DO NOT DOCKET IN THIS CASE - ALL ENTRIES ARE TO BE MADE IN CRIMINAL CASE
as 1:2023cv12147
Petitioner:
Luis Manuel Rodriguez Then
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Rodriguez-Cruz v. Administracion de Correccion
as 3:2023cv01101
Plaintiff:
Manuel Rodriguez-Cruz
Defendant:
Administracion de Correccion
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edwards v. Dorman et al
as 4:2022cv04056
Plaintiff:
Christopher Edwards
Defendant:
Sheriff Gary Dorman, Manuel Rodriguez, Deputy Michael Braddock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Rodriguez v. Pfeiffer et al
as 1:2021cv00572
Plaintiff:
Manuel Rodriguez
Defendant:
Michael Felder, Christian Pfeiffer, E. Vito and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodriguez v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2019cv00314
Respondent:
Nevada, State of, Nevada Attorney General and Perry Russell
Petitioner:
Jose Manuel Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rodriguez v. Russell et al
as 3:2019cv00117
Petitioner:
Jose Manuel Rodriguez
Respondent:
Nevada Attorney General, Perry Russell and State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
