Cases 1 - 10 of 81
Jones v. USA
as 1:2023cv00225
Petitioner:
Mark Jones
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Cenecharl v. Dixon et al
as 2:2023cv00535
Plaintiff:
Jean Cenecharl
Defendant:
Mr. Dixon, Mark Jones, Captain Robbins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cenecharl v. Dixon et al
as 2:2023cv00351
Plaintiff:
Jean Cenecharl
Defendant:
Mr. Dixon, Mark Jones, Captain Robbins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hardeman v. Cotton et al
as 1:2023cv02141
Plaintiff:
Jessie Lee Hardeman
Defendant:
Cheif Stacy Cotton, Captain Mark Jones, C. Mcfarlin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ward v. McCall et al
as 7:2023cv00198
Plaintiff:
Norel Sterling Ward and Norell
Defendant:
Matthew McCall, Mark Jones, Mark B. Frazier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ward v. McCall et al
as 1:2023cv00288
Plaintiff:
Norel Sterling Ward and Norell
Defendant:
Matthew McCall, Mark Jones, Mark B. Frazier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Clark
as 1:2022cv02226
Plaintiff:
Mark Jones
Defendant:
Tiffanie Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Clark
as 2:2022cv02080
Petitioner:
Mark Jones
Respondent:
Tiffanie Clark
Not Classified By Court:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moore v. Lyons et al
as 9:2021cv00299
Plaintiff:
Bart Thomas Moore
Defendant:
Byron Lyons, Jamie Richardson, Kayce Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BREWSTER v. LYLES et al
as 4:2021cv00155
Plaintiff:
GEORGE WALTER BREWSTER, III
Defendant:
Ms. TORRENZIA LYLES, Mr. MARK JONES, MUSCOGEE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CLERK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
