Cases 1 - 10 of 41
Haugan v. Padilla et al
as 4:2024cv04133
Defendant:
Kellie Wasko and Angel Luis Padilla
Plaintiff:
Matthew John Haugan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Olson v. Sage
as 1:2024cv01160
Respondent:
J. Sage
Petitioner:
Matthew John Olson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Prough v. Dallas County Jail et al
as 3:2023cv02182
Plaintiff:
Matthew John Prough
Defendant:
Dallas County Jail, Charlene Randolph and Fredrick Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marchbanks v. Wellpath et al
as 3:2023cv50192
Plaintiff:
Matthew John Marchbanks
Defendant:
Wellpath, Dr. Vipin Shah and McHenry County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Matagrano v. New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision et al
as 7:2022cv09564
Plaintiff:
Matthew John Mayagrano and Matthew John Matagrano
Defendant:
New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, New York State Office of Mental Health, Central New York Psychiatric Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Prough v. Bundy
as 3:2021cv02225
Petitioner:
Matthew John Prough
Respondent:
Benny Bundy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Matagrano v. Levitt et al
as 6:2021cv06415
Defendant:
Margaret J. Stirk, Terrance C. McCann, Jacqueline Levitt, MD and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew John Matagrano
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Armindariz v. Lumpkin
as 6:2020cv01053
Petitioner:
Matthew John Armindariz
Respondent:
Bobby D. Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
(PC) Austin v. Bell
as 2:2020cv01075
Plaintiff:
Matthew John Austin
Defendant:
Devon Bell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harrison v. Fortney et al
as 2:2020cv00761
Defendant:
Adam Fortney, Snohomish County Court - South Division and Rick Leo
Plaintiff:
Matthew John Harrison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
