Cases 1 - 10 of 114
Moore v. Watwood et al
as 1:2024cv01085
Plaintiff:
Michael Shane Moore
Defendant:
Brandon Watwood, Frank Strata, Jon Walton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Martin
as 2:2024cv00299
Plaintiff:
Michael R Moore
Defendant:
Howard C Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Hughes
as 2:2024cv00005
Petitioner:
Michael Ernest Moore
Respondent:
Craig Hughes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vue v. Moore et al
as 2:2023cv00981
Plaintiff:
Bee Vue
Defendant:
Michael D Moore and Officer Anna Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lionel Tate, Sr. v. L. Chavez, et al
as 23-15796
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LIONEL TATE, Sr.
Defendant / Appellee:
L. CHAVEZ, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS and others
BURNETT v. MOORE
as 3:2023cv00050
Petitioner:
KODY K BURNETT
Respondent:
SHERIFF MICHAEL J MOORE and Warden ANNETTIA TOBY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
John Young v. Los Angeles Police Department, et al
as 22-55984
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN C. YOUNG
Defendant / Appellee:
LOS ANGELES POLICE DEPARTMENT, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, RYAN SMITH and others
Prater v. Dixon et al
as 3:2022cv00888
Plaintiff:
Randall T. Prater
Defendant:
Ricky Dixon, Walter A. McNeil, Harry K. Singletary and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Tate v. Chavez, et al.,
as 2:2022cv00211
Plaintiff:
Lionel Tate, Sr.
Defendant:
L. Chavez, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR), University of California - Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Hellmann et al
as 4:2022cv00020
Petitioner:
Michael Allen Moore
Respondent:
Craig Hellmann and Michael Hayes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
