Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Frazier v. Kilgore et al
as 1:2021cv00810
Defendant:
Shea Brown, Bulter, Hoffman and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Fitzgerald Frazier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wiggleton v. Nance
as 9:2021cv01620
Petitioner:
Michael Fitzgerald Wiggleton
Respondent:
Jonathan Nance
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ROBERTS v. WILLIAMS et al
as 2:2015cv06629
Plaintiff:
JERMAINE O. ROBERTS
Defendant:
JAMES P. POWELL, MATTHEW FUNK, MICHAEL FITZGERALD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Fitzgerald v. Superintendent Forest SCI, et al
as 14-2875
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL FITZGERALD
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT FOREST SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY DELAWARE COUNTY
FITZGERALD v. CAPOZZA et al
as 2:2014cv00238
Petitioner:
MICHAEL FITZGERALD
Respondent:
MARK CAPOZZA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fitzgerald v. Barkley
as 1:2013cv02452
Plaintiff:
Michael Fitzgerald
Defendant:
Kimberly A. Barkley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FITZGERALD v. BURNS et al
as 2:2013cv03959
Petitioner:
MICHAEL FITZGERALD
Respondent:
DANIEL P. BURNS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
FITZGERALD v. BURNS et al
as 2:2013cv03417
Petitioner:
MICHAEL FITZGERALD
Respondent:
DANIEL P. BURNS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
FITZGERALD v. BURNS et al
as 2:2013cv01009
Petitioner:
MICHAEL FITZGERALD
Respondent:
DANIEL P. BURNS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Michael Wilson v. John Fox
as 12-40927
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL FITZGERALD WILSON
Respondent - Appellee:
JOHN FOX, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
