Cases 1 - 10 of 663
Smith v. Maddox
as 1:2024cv02514
Petitioner:
Stephenson Lamar Smith
Respondent:
Melody M. Maddox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Matthew Budney v. Nurse Julie
as 24-6529
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW BUDNEY
Defendant:
NURSE JULIE, NURSE ASHLEY, SHERIFF REYNOLDS, Laurens County and others
Neal v. Carter et al
as 5:2024ct03138
Plaintiff:
Christopher Neal and Christopher Lee Neal
Defendant:
RN Teresa Carter, P.A. Erica Kearney, Nurse Cora Maddox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GALINDEZ v. LOPEZ-RIVERA et al
as 5:2024cv00100
Plaintiff:
RALPH GALINDEZ
Defendant:
LUIS A LOPEZ-RIVERA, M FREHN and D MADDOX
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Matthew Budney v. Nurse Julie
as 24-6499
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW BUDNEY
Defendant:
NURSE JULIE, NURSE ASHLEY, Laurens County Jail, KIM LITTLE, Mental Health Laurens County Jail and others
Wingfield v. Clegg et al
as 1:2024cv02220
Plaintiff:
Timothy Bernard Wingfield
Defendant:
Thomas Scott Clegg, Jeffrey Mann and Melody Maddox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maddox, Jr. v. USA
as 5:2024cv00085
Petitioner:
William Edward Maddox, Jr.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Wilborn v. Maddox et al
as 1:2024cv01985
Plaintiff:
William R. Wilborn
Defendant:
Sheriff Melody Maddox, Jason Young and Naylor Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burchfield v. Roger D. Wilson Detention Facility et al
as 3:2024cv00193
Plaintiff:
Robert W Burchfield
Defendant:
Roger D. Wilson Detention Facility, Corporal Reece LNU, Nurse Jones LNU and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simmons v. Maddox
as 1:2024cv01880
Plaintiff:
Eric Simmons
Defendant:
Melody Maddox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
