Cases 1 - 10 of 218
George Harris v. Jeremy Benson
as 24-1391
Plaintiff:
GEORGE E. HARRIS
Defendant:
JEREMY R. BENSON, Unit Manager, BRADLEY N. HAMMOND, Assistant Unit Manager and SGT. MALLORY
AlBritton v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 7:2024cv00283
Plaintiff:
DeVinche Javon AlBritton
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Virginia, Counselor Kayla Mallory, David Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Mack v. Schwarzneggar et al
as 2:2024cv01221
Plaintiff:
Anthony E. Mack
Defendant:
Arnold Schwarzneggar, Edmund G. Brown, Gavin Newsom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hayes, Cordney v. Dixxon et al
as 4:2024cv10033
Plaintiff:
Cordney Mallory Hayes
Defendant:
Yvonne Dixxon, Yasmin Oaks, Luis Ibarra and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00199
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cordney Hayes v. Edwin Sabillon, et al
as 24-10905
Plaintiff:
CORDNEY MALLORY HAYES
Defendant:
EDWIN SABILLON, Sergeant, Monroe County Detention Center and SAMUEL CARPENTAR, Deputy, Monroe County Detention Center
Hayes, Cordney Mallory v. Linares
as 4:2024cv10027
Plaintiff:
Cordney Mallory Hayes
Defendant:
Joseph Linares
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Ray v. Boone
as 24-40169
Plaintiff:
Masika Brown Ray
Defendant:
Anthony Boone, Chief, Maxey Cerliano, Sheriff, City of Longview, Texas and others
Mallory v. USA
as 4:2024cv00262
Petitioner:
Marcel Mallory
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Hayes, Cordney Mallory v. Sabillon et al
as 4:2024cv10024
Plaintiff:
Cordney Mallory Hayes
Defendant:
Edwin Sabillon and Samuel Carpentar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
