Cases 1 - 10 of 71
Angela Hodges v. Manu Thomas, et al
as 23-15472
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANGELA SIMPSON HODGES
Defendant / Appellee:
MANU THOMAS, Lumley Unit Chaplain, BOBBY J. HARRIS, Senior Chaplain and DAVID SHINN, Director, Director of ADOC
Defendant:
KENNETH W. HERMAN, Director of Chaplaincy Services
Clements v. Judge Naftz et al
as 4:2023cv00108
Petitioner:
Amber M Clements
Respondent:
Judge Naftz and Sheriff Tony Manu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Manues v. Does
as 4:2022cv00806
Plaintiff:
Dustin Alexander Manues
Defendant:
Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hodges v. Thomas et al
as 2:2022cv00132
Plaintiff:
Angela Simpson Hodges
Defendant:
Manu Thomas, Bobby J Harris, Kenneth W Herman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hoskins v. Bannock County Commissioners et al
as 4:2021cv00481
Plaintiff:
David K Hoskins
Defendant:
Bannock County Commissioners, Sheriff Manu, Deputy Minio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sorensen v. Lum et al
as 1:2020cv00432
Defendant:
Joseph Lum, Colin Kim, Keith Kaneshiro and others
Plaintiff:
Manu Sorensen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stone v. Wilson et al
as 4:2020cv00406
Plaintiff:
Corey Wayne Stone
Defendant:
Martin Gutierrez, FNU Manus and Eric D Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Glover v. Deer Ridge Correctional Institution et al
as 3:2019cv01602
Defendant:
Assistant Director Michael Gower, Mr. Read, Mr. Reed and others
Plaintiff:
Darin A. Glover
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Manu v. Department of Homeland Security
as 1:2018cv00219
Petitioner:
Leoti Manu
Respondent:
Department of Homeland Security
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Santperez v. Department of Corrections and Community Supervision et al
as 1:2017cv03878
Plaintiff:
Jose Manue Santperez
Defendant:
Department of Corrections and Community Supervision and State of New York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
