Cases 1 - 10 of 11
DUKE v. KNIGHT
as 1:2020cv02207
Respondent:
WENDY KNIGHT
Petitioner:
MARK DUKE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Robert Spivey v. Joseph Wilson, et al
as 18-40007
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT DANIEL SPIVEY
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSEPH WILSON, Warden, individually and in his official capacity, CHADRICK S. CLARK, Lieutenant, individually and in his official capacity, MARK DUKE, Transportation Officer, individually and in his official capacity and others
Moten v. Duke et al
as 5:2016cv00328
Plaintiff:
Robert J Moten
Defendant:
Mark Duke and Steven Bobo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dukes v. The State of Texas et al
as 5:2016cv00424
Defendant:
Alamo Heights Police Dept., FNU De La Rosa, Nicolas LaHood and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Dukes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dukes v. Pamerleau et al
as 5:2016cv00385
Respondent:
Bexar County Adult Detention Center and Susan Pamerleau
Petitioner:
Mark Dukes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Dukes v. Pamerleau et al
as 5:2015cv00937
Defendant:
Alamo Heights Police Dept., Bexar County Sheriff's Department, L. De La Rosa and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Dukes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Duke v. Dunn
as 2:2015cv01462
Petitioner:
Mark Duke
Respondent:
Jefferson S Dunn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dukes v. Olivarri et al
as 5:2015cv00660
Plaintiff:
Mark Dukes
Defendant:
Nicholas LaHood, Ray J. Olivarri and Susan Pamerleau
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cheatham et al v. Thomas et al
as 4:2014cv01952
Plaintiff:
Antonio Cheatham , Mark Duke , James Edwards and others
Defendant:
Kim Thomas , James Deloach , Terrance McDonnell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Earls v. Fread et al
as 5:2012cv00264
Plaintiff:
Jacob Thomas Earls
Defendant:
Robbie Fread , Milton Peebles , Mark Duke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
