Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Parks v. Smith et al
as 3:2023cv08568
Petitioner:
Edward F Parks
Respondent:
Mathew Smith, Mohave, County of, Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Parks v. Smith et al
as 1:2023cv23138
Plaintiff:
Edward F. Parks
Defendant:
Mathew Smith, Mohave County Arizona and Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Edward Parks v. Mathew Smith, et al
as 22-15678
Petitioner / Appellant:
EDWARD FAYE PARKS
Respondent / Appellee:
MATHEW SMITH, DAVID SHINN, Director, ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA and others
Parks v. Smith et al
as 3:2021cv08207
Petitioner:
Edward Faye Parks
Respondent:
Mathew Smith, William Simon, Arizona, State of and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
PARKS v. GLOVER et al
as 1:2017cv01413
Plaintiff:
EDWARD F. PARKS
Defendant:
JIM GLOVER, JAMES ZACK, STEVEN CONN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peasley v. Mohave County Attorney's Office et al
as 3:2015cv08290
Plaintiff:
James Peasley
Defendant:
Mohave County Attorney's Office, Mohave County Sheriff's Department, Michael J Hruby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parks v. McCleary et al
as 3:2014cv08210
Plaintiff:
Edward Faye Parks
Defendant:
Shawn McCleary, James Zack, Mathew Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edward Parks v. Jefferey James, et al
as 14-16414
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD FAYE PARKS
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFFEREY JAMES, Attorney at Kaison Law Firm and MATHEW SMITH, Mohave County Attorney at Kingman Office
Parks v. James et al
as 3:2014cv08028
Plaintiff:
Edward Faye Parks
Defendant:
Jefferey James and Mathew Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ludlam v. Parker et al
as 5:2008cv00341
Plaintiff:
Steven Ray Ludlam
Defendant:
David Parker, Wayne Edwards, Mathew Smith and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
