Cases 1 - 10 of 144
Meares v. Lubbock Police Department et al
as 5:2024cv00116
Plaintiff:
Michael Aaron Meares
Defendant:
Lubbock Police Department, Sean House and Angelica Blanco
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MEARS v. C/O SMITH et al
as 2:2024cv06010
Plaintiff:
KEITH E. MEARS
Defendant:
C/O SMITH and WARDEN ORTIZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MEARS v. CASALE et al
as 2:2024cv06008
Plaintiff:
KEITH MEARS
Defendant:
DETECTIVE N. CASALE, JANE DOE and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Freeman v. Cross et al
as 3:2024cv00257
Plaintiff:
Lavonne Maurice Freeman
Defendant:
Aaron Cross, D. Mears, W. Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FORD v. HOGSETT et al
as 1:2023cv02294
Plaintiff:
RYANT FORD
Defendant:
JOE HOGSETT, RANDELL TAYLOR, KERRY FOSTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meares v. Rowe
as 5:2023cv00297
Petitioner:
Michael Meares
Respondent:
Kelly Rowe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
MASON et al v. SNYDER et al
as 1:2023cv02148
Plaintiff:
FRENCH CHESTER MASON, JR. and TARA MICHELLE MILLIGAN
Defendant:
JAMES KEVIN SNYDER, JENNIFER PRINZ HARRISON, JENNIFER HALEY SPRINGER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TURNER v. REGAL et al
as 1:2023cv01581
Plaintiff:
SPENCER TURNER
Defendant:
CHRISTINA REGAL, MARK SEVIER, J. FRENCH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meares v. Rowe, et al
as 5:2023cv00199
Plaintiff:
Michael Aaron Meares
Defendant:
Kelly Rowe, Lubbock County Detention Center and Charles Blevins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meares v. Rowe
as 5:2023cv00197
Petitioner:
Michael Aaron Meares
Respondent:
Kelly Rowe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
