Cases 1 - 10 of 117
Michael Thomas v. Michael Kolhouse, et al
as 24-1351
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL A. THOMAS
Defendant:
MICHAEL KOLHOUSE and PARKER TROMLEY
Thomas v. McBride et al
as 6:2024cv00563
Plaintiff:
Michael Thomas and Michael Darrell Thomas
Defendant:
Jeanette W McBride, J Newman and Judge J. Newman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Thomas v. Parnell, et al
as 3:2023cv01287
Plaintiff:
Michael F Thomas
Defendant:
Anthony G Parnell and Columbia County Sheriffs Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMAS v. PARNELL et al
as 4:2023cv00485
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL F THOMAS
Defendant:
ANTHONY G PARNELL and COLUMBIA COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Morrison et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2023cv00592
Plaintiff:
Michael LeRoy Thomas
Defendant:
J. Morrison and P. Harvey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Thomas et al
as 1:2023cv03983
Plaintiff:
Dontavious Matthew Harris
Defendant:
Michael N. Thomas, Newton County Sheriff Office Employees, Medical Team/NaphCare and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Morrison et al
as 2:2023cv01009
Petitioner:
Michael LeRoy Thomas
Respondent:
J Morrison and P Harvey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Woodruff et al
as 3:2023cv00006
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Thomas
Defendant:
Sheriff James Woodruff, Troup Co. Sheriff Dept, Dietian Donna and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Thomas v. Adam Douglas
as 22-2121
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL RAY THOMAS
Respondent / Appellee:
ADAM DOUGLAS, Acting Warden, Saginaw Correctional Facility
THOMAS v. KOLEHOUSE et al
as 2:2022cv00578
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ANTHONY THOMAS
Defendant:
MICHAEL ANTHONY KOLEHOUSE and TROMLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
