Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Elix v. Vann et al
as 5:2024cv00030
Plaintiff:
Michael Carey Elix
Defendant:
Timothy Vann, Wayne McKinney and Stephens County SFDP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
The Estate of Richard Daniel Thorson et al v. Cumberland County et al
as 1:2018cv01468
Plaintiff:
The Estate of Richard Daniel Thorson and Melinda Ann Thorson
Defendant:
Cumberland County, Christopher Colondrillo, Earl F. Reitz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
The Estate of Richard Daniel Thorson et al v. Cumberland County et al
as 4:2018cv01468
Defendant:
Jeff Ilgenfritz, Christopher Colondrillo, Sandra Abbey, LPN and others
Plaintiff:
The Estate of Richard Daniel Thorson and Melinda Ann Thorson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
The Estate of Richard Daniel Thorson et al v. Cumberland County et al
as 4:2018cv01468
Plaintiff:
The Estate of Richard Daniel Thorson and Melinda Ann Thorson
Defendant:
Cumberland County, Christopher Colondrillo, Earl F. Reitz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Little Dog v. Cooper et al
as 9:2018cv00097
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Steven Little Dog
Defendant:
David Cooper, Michael Carey, Jennifer Root and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DeWayne Michael Carey v. Ronald Davis
as 2:2017cv02611
Petitioner:
Dewayne Michael Carey
Respondent:
Ronald Davis
Carey v. Pratti et al
as 1:2015cv00767
Plaintiff:
Michael Carey
Defendant:
R. Pratti, Ron Davis and California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitations
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carey v. Connell
as 12-879
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Michael Carey
Defendant - Appellee:
Susan A. Connell, Superintendent
Carey v. Abbasi
as 1:2011cv00716
Plaintiff:
Michael Carey
Defendant:
Abbasi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carey v. Connell
as 7:2010cv03873
Plaintiff:
Michael Carey
Defendant:
Susan A. Connell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
