Cases 1 - 10 of 21
(PC) Williams v. Freeman et al
as 1:2021cv01016
Defendant:
Jeffrey Sugarman, David Rohrdanz and Michael Freeman
Plaintiff:
Richard Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Freeman v. Jaime-Daumy
as 3:2020cv05382
Defendant:
Ron Davis and R Jaime-Daumy
Plaintiff:
Michael Freeman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Freeman v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2019cv00601
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Petitioner:
Robert Michael Freeman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Freeman v. Sample, et al
as 18-12649
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL FREEMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
SAMPLE, Irwin County Detention Center, BENNETTE, Irwin County Detention Center and AKERS, Irwin County Detention Center
FREEMAN v. SAMPLE et al
as 7:2016cv00120
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL FREEMAN
Defendant:
SAMPLE, BENNETTE and AKERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCLEARY v. FERGUSON et al
as 2:2015cv06524
Petitioner:
MICHAEL FREEMAN MCLEARY
Respondent:
TAMMY FERGUSON, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA INC. and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Freeman v. Ascension Parish Jail et al
as 3:2015cv00659
Defendant:
Ascension Parish Jail, Paul Hall, Unknown McNeil and others
Plaintiff:
James Michael Freeman, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Freeman v. RUTHERFORD et al
as 3:2014cv01464
Plaintiff:
Theodore Michael Freeman
Defendant:
JOHN H RUTHERFORD, Sherry B. Torres, James M. Paris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nadauld v. Freeman, et al.
as 1:2014cv01831
Plaintiff:
Gilbert L. Nadauld
Defendant:
Michael Freeman and Li
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
[ANGE] v. BURKE et al
as 2:2014cv00286
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN MICHAEL [ANGE]
Defendant:
JOHN BURKE, MICHAEL FREEMAN, YORK COUNTY JAIL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
