Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Perez v. United States of America
as 1:2022cv21909
Plaintiff:
Carlos Miguel Perez
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Perez v. Federal Bureau of Prison et al
as 5:2021cv00492
Plaintiff:
Carlos Miguel Perez
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prison, Doctor Lee, Clinical Director Marchan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Perez v. Federal Bureau of Prison et al
as 3:2021cv00949
Plaintiff:
Carlos Miguel Perez
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prison, Doctor Lee, Clinical Director Marchan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perez v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2021cv01031
Defendant:
Unknown Serrano, Arizona, State of and Unknown Parties
Plaintiff:
Miguel Perez, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Posadas v. United States Of America
as 2:2019cv00041
Petitioner:
Miguel Perez Posadas
Respondent:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Lopez v. Green et al
as 5:2015cv00172
Plaintiff:
Francisco Lopez, Jr
Defendant:
NFN Green, Miguel Perez, Brad Livingston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PEREZ v. KERESTES et al
as 5:2015cv02727
Petitioner:
JOSE MIGUEL PEREZ
Respondent:
JOHN KERESTES and PA STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Perez v. Kerestes
as 3:2015cv00901
Petitioner:
Jose Miguel Perez
Respondent:
John Kerestes and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Perez #157060 v. Arizona Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2013cv02421
Defendant:
Arizona Department of Corrections, Unknown Summers, Unknown Shuster and others
Plaintiff:
Miguel Perez, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jose Perez v. Conner Blaine, et al
as 13-1302
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSE MIGUEL PEREZ
Defendant - Appellee:
CONNER BLAINE, Superintendent, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY LANCASTER COUNTY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
