Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Confessore v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 1:2019cv00627
Plaintiff:
Joseph M Confessore
Defendant:
Kylie Tisdale, Larry Shults, Thomas Kane and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Williams v. Fiorillo et al
as 1:2019cv00136
Defendant:
Morris Lewis, Mark S Inch, FNU Buckner and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony D Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanchez v. Sessions et al
as 1:2018cv00471
Respondent:
Ken Paxton, Dallas B Jones, J F Caraway and others
Petitioner:
Noe Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Howard v. St. Louis County Justice Center et al
as 4:2017cv02577
Plaintiff:
Larry Terrell Howard
Defendant:
St. Louis County Justice Center and Morris Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bruce v. Denney, et al
as 15-3263
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTOINE BRUCE
Defendant - Appellee:
DONALD DENNEY, Regional Psychology Services Administrator, MORRIS LEWIS, Regional Psychology Treatment Program Coordinator, PAUL LAIRD, Regional Director and others
Phillip Lewis v. Warden, Phillips State Prison
as 14-14151
Petitioner - Appellant:
PHILLIP MORRIS LEWIS
Respondent - Appellee:
PHILLIPS SP WARDEN
Bruce v. Denney et al
as 5:2014cv03026
Plaintiff:
Antoine Bruce
Defendant:
Donald Denney, Morris Lewis, Paul Laird and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jeremy Pinson v. Morris Lewis, et al
as 14-1122
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEREMY PINSON
Defendant - Appellee:
MORRIS LEWIS, DONALD DENNEY, DOCTOR REYNOLDS and others
STINE v. REYNOLDS et al
as 2:2013cv00431
Defendant:
DONALD DENNEY, MAJOR JOHN DOE, MORRIS LEWIS and others
Plaintiff:
MIKEAL STINE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
PINSON et al v. REYNOLDS et al
as 2:2013cv00428
Defendant:
DONALD DENNEY, JOHN DOE, MORRIS LEWIS and others
Plaintiff:
JEREMY PINSON and MIKEAL STINE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
