Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Kitchen v. Sutton et al
as 4:2023cv00205
Plaintiff:
William George Kitchen, III
Defendant:
Ms. Sutton, Chatham County Detention Center/Jail, John T. Wilcher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mason v. Johnston et al
as 0:2019cv02597
Plaintiff:
Ricky Mason
Defendant:
Nancy Johnston, Blake Carey, Jim Berg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burke v. Wilcher et al
as 4:2017cv00098
Plaintiff:
Corey Quinn Burke
Defendant:
John T. Wilcher, B. Kirkland, Melissa S. Kohne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CLYBURN v. GORDON et al
as 2:2016cv03536
Petitioner:
ANNE L. CLYBURN
Respondent:
MICHAEL P. GORDON, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
KEY v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY PROBATION AND PAROLE et al
as 2:2016cv01039
Plaintiff:
ERNEST KEY
Defendant:
MONTGOMERY COUNTY PROBATION AND PAROLE, MICHAEL P. GORDON and KELLY ANNE TOPELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KEY v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY PROBATION AND PAROLE et al
as 2:2015cv03739
Plaintiff:
ERNEST KEY
Defendant:
MONTGOMERY COUNTY PROBATION AND PAROLE, MICHAEL P. GORDON and KELLY ANNE TOPELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PARKER v. DEL RICCI et al
as 2:2015cv03513
Plaintiff:
JASON PARKER
Defendant:
THOMAS M. DEL RICCI, MONTGOMERY COUNTY PROBATION, RISA V. FURMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robert Gordon v. USA
as 14-3318
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT P. GORDON
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Payne et al v. Pummill et al
as 2:2013cv01172
Plaintiff:
Lowell N. Payne, Clifford L. Rucker, James Robinson and others
Defendant:
Cathy Pummill, Jane Doe Park, Amy Hamilton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BYAM v. GORDON
as 2:2012cv04257
Plaintiff:
MAUREEN M. BYAM
Defendant:
MICHAEL P. GORDON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
