Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Hail et al v. Scott et al
as 6:2021cv00378
Defendant:
Jamie Alvarez, MD., B. E. Uebele, IV, A. Moody and others
Plaintiff:
C. Hail Debond, P. K. Hail Smith, Jayson Hail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nooner v. Bryant et al
as 1:2019cv01014
Defendant:
Stacey Pectol, J. Leon Holmes, Sue Newberry and others
Plaintiff:
Terrick Nooner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MAHATHA v. GOULD et al
as 1:2018cv00698
Defendant:
ROWAN CLERK OF COURT, B. C. BENFIELD, RICHARD D. LOCKLEAR and others
Plaintiff:
CORY ANTOINE MAHATHA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kenyon et al v. State or Oregon et al
as 3:2015cv02295
Respondent:
County of Multnomah, State or Oregon and Judith L. Swanson
Petitioner:
B. P. K., T. F. K. and Shane Timothy Kenyon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
REID v. CAPT et al
as 1:2015cv00022
Plaintiff:
CALEB REID
Defendant:
CAPT, PRICE, P. K. PHILLIPS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moliere Dimanche, Jr. v. P. Johnson, et al
as 14-10709
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MOLIERE DIMANCHE, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
P. K. JOHNSON, K. SEAGO, LIEUTENANT, GLENN YOUNG, ASSISTANT WARDEN and others
Raygosa v. Burt et al
as 3:2012cv02784
Plaintiff:
Javier Raygosa
Defendant:
R. Burt, G. J. Janda, McEwen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DIMANCHE v. JOHNSON et al
as 4:2012cv00267
Plaintiff:
MOLIERE DIMANCHE, JR
Defendant:
P K JOHNSON, S BEARDEN, TAMERA POYNTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fernando Bustillo v. Harley Lappin, et al
as 12-2019
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Fernando Bustillo
Defendant - Appellee:
Harley Lappin, Med.Director Newton Kending, Michael K. Nelley and others
Fernando Bustillo v. Harley Lappin, et al
as 11-1737
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Fernando Bustillo
Defendant - Appellee:
Harley Lappin, Med.Director Newton Kending, Michael K. Nelley and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
