Cases 1 - 10 of 66
Sitzes et al v. Elyea et al
as 1:2023cv01154
Plaintiff:
Clayton W Sitzes, Ryan Mills, Patrick Murphy and others
Defendant:
Willard O Elyea, Michael Puisis, Steven Bowman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MURPHY v. RULE et al
as 2:2023cv00152
Petitioner:
JAMES PATRICK MURPHY
Respondent:
T. RULE and FCI TERRE HAUTE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Covington, Reo v. Bowens, Nancy et al
as 3:2023cv00166
Plaintiff:
Reo L. Covington
Defendant:
Nancy Bowens, Patrick Murphy, Heinrich Roerhich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Murphy et al
as 2:2022cv01534
Plaintiff:
Cory A Brown
Defendant:
Patrick Murphy, Jake Brickner, Michael Milner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murphy v. USA
as 4:2022cv04174
Petitioner:
Sean Patrick Murphy
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Covington, Reo v. Bowens, Nancy et al
as 3:2022cv00543
Plaintiff:
Reo L. Covington
Defendant:
Nancy Bowens, Patrick Murphy, Nurse Bermier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murphy v. Corrections Center of Northwest Ohio
as 3:2021cv00682
Plaintiff:
Daniel Patrick Murphy
Defendant:
Corrections Center of Northwest Ohio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Chaffee Court et al
as 1:2021cv00020
Defendant:
Patrick Murphy, Sam Weihman, Ramsey and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Covington, Reo v. Smith, Judy et al
as 3:2020cv00802
Plaintiff:
Reo L. Covington
Defendant:
Nancy Bowens, Judy Smith, Patrick Murphy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murphy v. Correction Center of Northwest Ohio
as 3:2020cv02103
Defendant:
Correction Center of Northwest Ohio
Plaintiff:
Daniel Patrick Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
