Cases 1 - 10 of 7,265
Hunter, Cornelius v. Schumacher, Michael et al
as 3:2024cv00408
Plaintiff:
Cornelius I. Hunter
Defendant:
Michael A. Schumacher, Jon M. Theisen, Peter J. Rindal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 2:2024cv01451
Plaintiff:
Paul D Mitchell, II
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Colette S Peters and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00307
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Peters v. Warden - FCI Greenville et al
as 3:2024cv01520
Plaintiff:
Kari Ann Peters
Defendant:
Warden - FCI Greenville, Amber Fitzpatrick and Ms. Newsome
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
ROBISON v. WENGER et al
as 2:2024cv03219
Petitioner:
BRADLEY C. ROBISON
Respondent:
BEAU D. WENGER, David C Young, COLIN E. PETERS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
ROBISON v. WENGER et al
as 2:2024cv03217
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY C. ROBISON
Defendant:
BEAU D. WENGER, Scott A Smith, David C Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ryan v. Watson et al
as 2:2024cv11534
Plaintiff:
Sean Michael Ryan
Defendant:
Peter Watson, Heidi Washington, Cargor and others
Shannon Agofsky v. BOP, et al
as 24-2007
Plaintiff:
SHANNON WAYNE AGOFSKY
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, COLETTE S. PETERS, ANDRE MATEVOUSIAN and others
TOOTLE v. DOE et al
as 1:2024cv00162
Plaintiff:
BRIAN TOOTLE
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, MILLER, PETERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Laskoski, Brian v. Larson, Chelsea et al
as 3:2024cv00382
Plaintiff:
Brian Laskoski
Defendant:
Chelsea Larson, Peter Ridal and John Thorson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
