Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Thomas v. Creuzot
as 24-10395
Plaintiff:
Deuntae Thomas, Estate/Cestui Qui Trust
Defendant:
John Coleman Creuzot, #05069200 14th Amendment US Corporate Citizen Acting as District Attorney, Dallas County, City of Dallas, Texas and others
Lucas v. Kelley et al
as 9:2024cv00502
Plaintiff:
London Lucas and London H. Lucas
Defendant:
Kelley, Dr. Macri, RN Napoli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02646
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1101 Immigration and Nationality Act
Quy Nguyen v. USA
as 22-36053
Petitioner / Appellant:
QUY DINH NGUYEN, AKA The Boss, AKA The Godfather, AKA The Old Man
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
(PC) Hill v. Qui
as 2:2022cv01821
Plaintiff:
Cymeyon Hill
Defendant:
Suzi Qui, N. R. Smith, Conrad and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Hill v. Troth et al
as 2:2022cv01817
Plaintiff:
Cymeyon Hill
Defendant:
Officer Suzi Qui, Suziki and Troth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Qui
as 4:2022cv05820
Plaintiff:
Cymeyon V. Hill
Defendant:
Suzi Qui, N. R. Smith, Conrad and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Troth et al
as 4:2022cv05442
Plaintiff:
Cymeyon V. Hill
Defendant:
Officer Troth, Dr. Suziki and Officer Suzi Qui
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Marie Assa'ad-Faltas v. Sarah Weiss
as 22-1917
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARIE THERESE ASSA'AD-FALTAS
Defendant / Appellee:
SARA HEATHER SAVITZ WEISS, JOHN MEADORS, BARNEY GIESE, all three individually for damages arising from malicious prosecution and for qui tam recovery and others
Nguyen v. United States of America
as 2:2022cv01127
Petitioner:
Quy Dinh Nguyen
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
