Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 43
Boards v. English et al
as 3:2024cv00358
Plaintiff: Carl R Webb II Boards and Carl Roy Webb II Boards
Defendant: Loren, Arron Smith, Brian English and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Cookie Crews et al
as 5:2024cv00077
Plaintiff: Kyle Thompson
Defendant: Cookie Crews, Allyson Lambert, Amanda Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WEBB v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 1:2024cv00028
Petitioner: MERLE R. WEBB
Respondent: STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ROBERTS v. WEBB et al
as 3:2023cv24696
Plaintiff: JAVONEY DEVON ROBERTS
Defendant: JAMES R WEBB, C SIMMONS and T ARMSTRONG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nathaniel Webb v. Trooper Hundley
as 23-6768
Plaintiff / Appellant: NATHANIEL R. WEBB
Defendant / Appellee: TROOPER HUNDLEY, TROOPER CLAYTON, SERGEANT GARDNER and others
Nathaniel Webb v. John Godfrey
as 23-6261
Petitioner / Appellant: NATHANIEL R. WEBB
Respondent / Appellee: JOHN GODFREY
Webb v. State of Mississippi We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv00096
Plaintiff: Charles R. Webb, Jr.
Defendant: State of Mississippi
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Webb v. Buffaloe et al
as 5:2022ct03192
Plaintiff: Nathaniel R. Webb
Defendant: Eddie M. Buffaloe, Todd E. Ishee, Cathy Judge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Webb v. TextBehind
as 5:2022cv00055
Plaintiff: Nathaniel R. Webb
Defendant: TextBehind
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nathaniel Webb v. Director Butler We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-7441
Plaintiff / Appellant: NATHANIEL R. WEBB
Defendant / Appellee: DIRECTOR BUTLER, YOLANDA BANKS, E. GEORGE and others
Defendant: WAKE COUNTY JAIL

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?