Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Cole v. Cook County Department Corrections et al
as 1:2023cv04378
Plaintiff:
Kionte R. Cole
Defendant:
Cook County Department Corrections, John Doe (1), John Doe (2) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lay, et al v. Crow, et al
as 22-6112
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WADE LAY, by and through his next friend Rhonda Kemp
Plaintiff:
BRENDA E. ANDREW, RONSON KYLE BUSH, JEMAINE MONTEIL CANNON and others
Defendant / Appellee:
SCOTT CROW, RANDY CHANDLER, BETTY GESELL and others
Coddington, et al v. Crow, et al
as 22-6100
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES A. CODDINGTON, BENJAMIN R. COLE, CARLOS CUESTA-RODRIGUEZ and others
Defendant / Appellee:
SCOTT CROW, RANDY CHANDLER, BETTY GESELL and others
Grant, et al v. Crow, et al
as 22-6012
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DONALD ANTHONY GRANT and GILBERT RAY POSTELLE
Plaintiff:
JAMES A. CODDINGTON, BENJAMIN R. COLE, CARLOS CUESTA-RODRIGUEZ and others
Defendant / Appellee:
SCOTT CROW, RANDY CHANDLER, BETTY GESELL and others
TISDALE v. WEAVIL et al
as 1:2021cv00913
Plaintiff:
IVORY JOE TISDALE
Defendant:
T.A. WEAVIL, C. SHEETS, S. JARRELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marcel Ford v. Unknown
as 2:2021cv00088
Plaintiff:
Marcel Ford
Defendant:
Unknown, Sgt. T. Parish, Lt. R. Cole and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ford v. Baldwin et al
as 3:2019cv50074
Defendant:
Brothers, Walker, Robinson and others
Plaintiff:
Melvin Antoni Ford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Smith v. Parriot et al
as 2:2019cv00288
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Christopher Smith
Defendant:
R. Cole, Wilfredo Gutierrez, Brian L. Parriot and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coles v. Ma et al
as 2:2017cv02234
Plaintiff:
Jameel R. Coles
Defendant:
Jian Ma and A. Nangalama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COLES v. FERGUSON et al
as 5:2017cv01959
Petitioner:
MIKAEL R. COLES
Respondent:
TAMMY FERGUSON and PA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
