Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Raymond Thomas v. Complex Warden of USP Lompoc
as 2:2020cv06585
Petitioner:
Raymond Thomas
Respondent:
Complex Warden of USP Lompoc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Raymond Thomas Garcia Jr. v. Superior Court of the County of San Bernardino Juvenile Dependency, et al
as 5:2020cv01325
Petitioner:
Raymond Thomas Garcia, Jr and Raymond Garcia, II
Respondent:
Superior Court of the County of San Bernardino Juvenile Dependency
Defendant:
S.B. County Children and Family Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Raymond Thomas Garcia Jr. et al v. San Bernardino County Dept. of Child Protection Services et al
as 5:2019cv01025
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Cline, Erin Medley, Raymond Thomas Garcia, Jr and others
Defendant:
Does Police Officials, official capacity, Teresa Cano, Jarrod Burrguan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Raymond Thomas v. Felipe Martinez
as 2:2019cv04207
Petitioner:
Raymond Thomas
Respondent:
Warden Felipe Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Garcia v. Madden
as 3:2019cv00647
Plaintiff:
Raymond Thomas Garcia, Jr.
Defendant:
Raymond Madden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Tetzlaff v. USA
as 1:2019cv00024
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Raymond Thomas Tetzlaff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Thomas v. Lothrop
as 2:2018cv03301
Petitioner:
Raymond Thomas
Respondent:
William Lothrop
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Raymond Thomas v. Warden of FCI-Edgefield
as 17-7401
Petitioner - Appellant:
RAYMOND THOMAS
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN FCI EDGEFIELD
Thomas v. Fulwood et al
as 1:2016cv03928
Petitioner:
Raymond Thomas
Respondent:
Warden of FCI-Edgefield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Garcia v. Superior Court of Kern County et al
as 3:2016cv02123
Petitioner:
Raymond Thomas Garcia, Jr.
Respondent:
Superior Court of Kern County and California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
