Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Hill v. WellPath Medical Corporation et al
as 4:2024cv00284
Plaintiff:
Adam Hill
Defendant:
WellPath Medical Corporation, Kent, Rory Griffin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roberts v. Rester et al
as 2:2024cv00194
Plaintiff:
Bryan Clayton Roberts
Defendant:
Justin Rester, Department of Public Safety and Corrections Louisiana State and Louisiana State
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stockton v. Huff et al
as 4:2023cv00476
Plaintiff:
Joshua M Stockton
Defendant:
Ramona Huff, Aundrea Culclager, Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Payne et al
as 4:2023cv00155
Plaintiff:
Adam Hill
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Aundrea Culclager, Benny Magnus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Payne et al
as 4:2022cv01201
Plaintiff:
Adam Hill
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, William Straughn, Dale Reed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Casby v. Rester
as 22-30107
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Terrell T. Casby
Defendant / Appellee:
Justin Rester, Sergeant, Scott Williams, Master Sergeant, Jeremy Sistrunk, Lieutenant and others
Casby v. Rester et al
as 2:2020cv02424
Defendant:
Scott Williams, Donnie Seal, Wade Rigdon and others
Plaintiff:
Terrell T Cosby and Terrell T. Casby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitaker v. McDougall CC et al
as 3:2019cv01355
Defendant:
Legal Mail Recipients, McDougall CC, CCI Mental Health and others
Plaintiff:
Precell Whitaker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniels v. Rester et al
as 2:2018cv05292
Plaintiff:
Clarence Antoine Daniels
Defendant:
Justin Rester, Jacob Waskom and Bradon Nichols
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COUCH v. KNOX et al
as 4:2018cv00236
Plaintiff:
JEFFERY E COUCH, II
Defendant:
KNOX, CARTER, RESTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
