Cases 1 - 10 of 12
McDonald v. United States of America
as 3:2023cv00056
Petitioner:
Richard McDonald
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Saplan v. McDonald et al
as 4:2022cv04708
Plaintiff:
Reynaldo Saplan
Defendant:
H. Richard McDonald, Judy Chen and Charles Ng
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rech v. McDonald
as 22-1660
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michael Rech
Defendant / Appellee:
Fay McDonald, Richard McDonald, Jeffrey Rech and others
Defendant:
Rech Family Corporation, Hilltop Drive, LLC, Hilltop Drive of New York and others
MCDONALD v. KASSIS
as 5:2022cv02490
Plaintiff:
ERIC RICHARD McDONALD
Defendant:
ABRAHAM KASSIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rech v. McDonald et al
as 6:2022cv06172
Plaintiff:
Michael Rech
Defendant:
Fay McDonald, Richard McDonald, Jeffrey Rech and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Derrick L. Johnson v. Richard McDonald et al
as 2:2020cv00071
Defendant:
Richard McDonald, Jared O Farrell and City of Riverside
Plaintiff:
Derrick L Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edwards v. McDonald et al
as 3:2019cv02042
Defendant:
Sadeghi Jahangir, H. Richard McDonald, San Quentin State Prison and others
Plaintiff:
Randall A Edwards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McDonald v. Commissioner of Corrections et al
as 8:2019cv00825
Respondent:
Asst. Warden Walter West, Brian Frosh and Commissioner of Corrections
Petitioner:
Richard McDonald
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
US v. Richard McDonald
as 16-7246
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RICHARD MCDONALD
Derrick L. Johnson v. City of Riverside et al
as 5:2016cv01815
Defendant:
City of Riverside, Richard McDonald, Richard McDonald and others
Plaintiff:
D. J., E. J. and Derrick L Johnson
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
