Cases 1 - 8 of 8
US v. Richard Tipton
as 22-5
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
RICHARD TIPTON, a/k/a Whittey
Tipton v. USA
as 3:2022cv00100
Petitioner:
Richard Tipton
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Tipton v. USA
as 3:2022cv00099
Petitioner:
Richard Tipton
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
IN THE MATTER OF THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS' EXECUTION PROTOCOL CASES
as 1:2019mc00145
Defendant:
CHADRICK EVAN FULKS, PAUL LAIRD, ERIC H. HOLDER, JR. and others
Plaintiff:
ALFRED BOURGEOIS, JULIUS ROBINSON, JAMES H. ROANE, JR., and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
BRUCE WEBSTER, ANTHONY BATTLE and ORLANDO HALL
Intervenor Defendant:
RICHARD VEACH
Intervenor:
JEFFREY PAUL
In Re:
IN THE MATTER OF THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS' EXECUTION PROTOCOL CASES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Sharp #194939 v. Ulabarrie et al
as 2:2013cv02607
Plaintiff:
David Lee Sharp
Defendant:
B Ulabarrie and Richard Tipton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
US v. Richard Tipton
as 13-8
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RICHARD TIPTON, a/k/a Whittey
Tipton v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2013cv00346
Plaintiff:
Richard Tipton
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
James Roane, et al v. Karen Tandy, et al
as 12-5020
Plaintiff - Appellee:
James H. Roane, Richard Tipton and Cory Johnson
Movant - Appellant:
Jeffrey Paul
Intervenor For Plaintiff - Appellee:
Bruce Webster, Anthony Battle and Orlando Hall
Defendant - Appellee:
Karen P. Tandy, Administrator, Drug Enforcement Administration, Harley G. Lappin, Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Newton E. Kendig, II, Medical Director, Health Services Division, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Intervenor For Defendant - Appellee:
Richard Veach, Warden, U.S. Penitentiary Terre Haute
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
