Cases 1 - 10 of 101
Dalton v. State of Tennessee et al
as 2:2024cv00007
Plaintiff:
Jeremy James Dalton
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Fentress County, Shane Sexton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fletcher v. Garland et al
as 3:2023cv00244
Plaintiff:
Anthony L. Fletcher
Defendant:
Merrick B. Garland, U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fletcher v. Garland et al
as 3:2023cv00230
Plaintiff:
Anthony L. Fletcher
Defendant:
Merrick B. Garland, United States Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roane v. General Assembly et al
as 1:2023cv00743
Plaintiff:
Melvin M. Roane
Defendant:
General Assembly and Harold Clarke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
Dalton v. State of Tennessee et al
as 1:2023cv01049
Plaintiff:
Jeremy James Dalton
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Fentress County, Shane Sexton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vinson v. Roane
as 5:2023cv00092
Petitioner:
Adrian Vinson
Respondent:
Warden Roane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Holmes v. Roane
as 5:2023cv00062
Petitioner:
Seth Holmes
Respondent:
Warden Roane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
US v. James Roane, Jr.
as 23-1
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMES H. ROANE, JR., a/k/a J.R.
Villarreal-Solis v. Roane
as 3:2023cv00002
Petitioner:
Hugo Villarreal-Solis
Defendant:
Acting Warden D. Roane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Helton v. Whitson et al
as 0:2022cv00112
Plaintiff:
Thomas Helton
Defendant:
Kristen Whitson, Brian Baier, Roane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
