Cases 1 - 10 of 10
CRAWFORD v. WARD et al
as 5:2020cv00184
Defendant:
GDC DIRECTOR ROBERT TOOLE, GOVERNOR BRIAN KEMP and GDC COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD
Plaintiff:
ROBERT CRAWFORD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crawford v. Keene et al
as 1:2018cv01159
Defendant:
Tim Keene, Kevin Cook, Cass County Sheriff Department and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Crawford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crawford v. Couture et al
as 6:2017cv00004
Plaintiff:
Robert Crawford
Defendant:
Casey Couture, United States, Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crawford v. Chappius
as 1:2015cv03650
Respondent:
Paul Chappius
Petitioner:
Robert Crawford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CRAWFORD v. HENDRICKS et al
as 2:2014cv04167
Plaintiff:
ROBERT CRAWFORD
Defendant:
ROY HENDRICKS and ALFARO ORTIZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CRAWFORD v. HENDRICKS et al
as 2:2014cv04168
Plaintiff:
ROBERT CRAWFORD
Defendant:
ROY HENDRICKS and ORTIZ ALFARO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crawford v. Doyle et al
as 9:2013cv00189
Petitioner:
Robert Crawford
Respondent:
Jay Doyle, Lori Thibodeau and Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Crawford v. Battrick et al
as 3:2010cv00683
Defendant:
Renee Baker, William Battrick, Thomas Prince and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Crawford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crawford v. Ely State Prison et al
as 3:2006cv00604
Plaintiff:
Robert Crawford
Defendant:
Ely State Prison and Nevada State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crawford v. Nevada State Prision Medical Department et al
as 3:2007cv00069
Plaintiff:
Robert Crawford
Defendant:
Nevada State Prision Medical Department, Staff of Nevada State Prision Medical Team and Sherman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
