Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Rhodes v. Ames
as 5:2022cv00032
Petitioner:
Robert Rhodes
Respondent:
Donald Ames
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Austin v. Rhoades et al
as 3:2021cv00269
Defendant:
C/O Morris, Sgt. Royster, Robert Rhodes and others
Plaintiff:
Lazerek Austin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
RHODES v. OBERLANDER et al
as 1:2020cv00169
Defendant:
DEREK F. OBERLANDER and STATE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION- FOREST'S CORRECTION EMERGENCY RESPONSE TEAM
Plaintiff:
ROBERT RHODES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Rhode v. Indiana Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2019cv00705
Defendant:
Lindsy Knopf, Roberts, Blagovich and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Rhode
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rhode v. Warden
as 3:2019cv00522
Petitioner:
Robert Rhode and Robert F Rhode
Respondent:
Warden
Not Yet Classified:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
RHODES v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2017cv13178
Petitioner:
ROBERT RHODES
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and GEORGE O. ROBINSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Conner v. Rubenstein et al
as 2:2015cv16208
Plaintiff:
Michael Lee Conner, Jr.
Defendant:
Jim Rubenstein , John Frame , David Ballard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Ballard et al
as 2:2015cv16550
Plaintiff:
Steven J. Taylor
Defendant:
David Ballard , Rose , Iotov and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curtis v. Close et al
as 2:2014cv24624
Plaintiff:
Michael Curtis
Defendant:
Justin Close , Jason Bragg , Brandon Leazure and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Winter v. Plumley et al
as 2:2014cv26977
Plaintiff:
Jacob Benjamin Winter
Defendant:
Mark Plumley, Clifton Carr, Margaret Cliffard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
