Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Warner v. Pasco County Jail et al
as 8:2022cv01798
Plaintiff:
Theodore Robert Warner
Defendant:
Pasco County Jail, Chris Nocco and Wellpath Healthcare
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burleson et al v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
as 1:2020cv01086
Plaintiff:
Raymond Wilson, Chase Burford, Richard D. Sullivan and others
Defendant:
Henderson Unit, Lablanc Unit, Tarrant County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv00137
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Griffin v. Bishop et al
as 8:2017cv01767
Plaintiff:
Warren Michael Griffin
Defendant:
Frank Bishop, William Bohrer, Robert Warner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Farmington Correctional Center et al
as 4:2013cv00789
Plaintiff:
Charles Johnson
Defendant:
Farmington Correctional Center, Tom Villmer, Gwen Botkin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gorman v. Lombardi et al
as 4:2012cv00167
Plaintiff:
Walter E. Gorman
Defendant:
George A. Lombardi, Douglas Prudden, Chantay Godert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Quantrell Cody v. Robert Ebert, et al
as 10-2986
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Quantrell E. Cody
Defendant - Appellee:
Robert Ebert, Investigator, Farmington Correctional Center, Marvin H. Chapman, Correctional Officer II, Farmington Correctional Center, Lindell Edmonds, Caseworker I, Farmington Correctional Center and others
Cody v. Ebert et al
as 4:2010cv00671
Plaintiff:
Quantrell E. Cody
Defendant:
Robert Ebert, Marvin H. Chapman, Lindell R. Edmonds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Warner v. Norris
as 5:2007cv05031
Plaintiff:
Clifton Robert Warner
Defendant:
Larry Norris and Attorney General, State of Arkansas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
