Cases 1 - 10 of 395
Shaun A. Jones v. C.O. Moisa et al
as 2:2024cv01819
Plaintiff:
Shaun A. Jones
Defendant:
C.O. Moisa, Sgt. John Doe One, John Doe One and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Rosales v. USA
as 1:2023cv00224
Petitioner:
Teri Lynn Rosales
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Rosales v. USA
as 3:2023cv00354
Petitioner:
Jason Rosales
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Rosales-Wences v. Bergami
as 3:2023cv50415
Petitioner:
Sergio Rosales-Wences
Respondent:
Mr. R. Maldonado and Thomas E. Bergami
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Rosales-Wences v. Maldonado
as 1:2023cv15998
Petitioner:
Sergio Rosales-Wences
Respondent:
Mr. R. Maldonado
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Rosales-Wences v. Maldonado
as 4:2023cv04201
Petitioner:
Sergio Rosales-Wences
Respondent:
Mr. R. Maldonado
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Paredes Garcia v. Rosales et al
as 1:2023cv01361
Petitioner:
Pablo Paredes Garcia
Respondent:
Geraldo Rosales and FNU Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Rosales v. Washburn et al
as 3:2023cv08557
Petitioner:
Juan Carlos Rosales
Respondent:
Unknown Washburn and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Gray v. Warden et al
as 1:2023cv01297
Plaintiff:
Thomas Eugene Gray
Defendant:
Warden, Assistant Warden, Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. Lubbock County Sheriff
as 5:2023cv00184
Petitioner:
Charles Young
Respondent:
TDCJ Parole Division, Daniella Martinez, Vicente Perez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
