Cases 1 - 10 of 538
Rutherford v. Haynes
as 7:2024cv00374
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Rutherford
Defendant:
Dr. Greg Haynes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rutherford v. Steadman et al
as 3:2024cv01023
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Jovon Rutherford
Defendant:
S. Steadman, P. Wingo, B. Gomez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
James v. McCullough et al
as 3:2024cv00455
Plaintiff:
Camron O. James
Defendant:
Andrew McCullough and Rutherford Co. Adult Det. Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Public Defenders Office et al
as 3:2024cv00685
Plaintiff:
Justin Ray Miller
Defendant:
Public Defenders Office, District Attorneys Office and Rutherford County Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rutherford v. Unknown
as 2:2024cv00359
Plaintiff:
Timothy Rutherford
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ellis v. Harrell et al
as 3:2024cv00351
Plaintiff:
Leonard Ellis
Defendant:
f/n/u Harrell, Rutherford County Jail, Rutherford County Shirfe Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hovis v. Wilson et al
as 1:2024cv00142
Plaintiff:
Oreon Tyshon Hovis
Defendant:
Wayne Wilson, FNU Moore, County of Rutherford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zimmer v. Rutherford County et al
as 3:2024cv00525
Plaintiff:
Brevan Zimmer
Defendant:
Rutherford County and Dr. John Daniel Rudd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rutherford v. Linthieum et al
as 4:2024cv00724
Plaintiff:
Scott Rutherford
Defendant:
Lannette Linthieum, Owen Murray, Philip Keiser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rutherford v. Free et al
as 2:2024cv00764
Plaintiff:
Clinton Rutherford
Defendant:
Corby Free, Ashley Marsh, Lt. Jhones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
