Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-3880
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv01119
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Harris v. United States of America et al
as 3:2018cv00510
Respondent:
Justice Samuel A. Alito, Jr., Justice Routh Bader, Justice Stephen G. Breyer and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Petitioner:
Jimmy Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Souter v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2017cv00544
Petitioner:
John D. Souter, Jr.
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Souter v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2017cv01895
Petitioner:
John D. Souter, Jr.
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kidd v. University of Texas Medical Branch et al
as 9:2017cv00172
Plaintiff:
Carlos Kidd
Defendant:
University of Texas Medical Branch, Chi Saint Lukes Hospital, FNU Wen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HENSON v. COMMISSIONER et al
as 1:2013cv01020
Defendant:
KEITH BUTTS, CURTIS BYNUM, COMMISSIONER and others
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY G. HENSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
John Souter, Jr. v. Ellis, et al
as 13-12555
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN D. SOUTER, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
ELLIS, Warden, HENDERSON, Warden, HAAS, Warden and others
Souter v. Coleman et al
as 3:2011cv01159
Plaintiff:
John D. Souter, Jr.
Defendant:
Taurus Coleman, S. Brooker, D. Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Russell Fennell v. Tasha Souter et al
as 5:2011cv00967
Defendant:
Deborah Baskins, Noah DeGaetano, Elizabeth Freeman and others
Plaintiff:
Russell Fennell
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
