Prisoner Petitions Cases
Coffey v. Lancaster, City of et al
as 1:2024cv01434
Plaintiff: Anaysheon Coffey
Defendant: Lancaster, City of, Lancaster Police Department, City of, Scott Grant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Schlosser v. Kwak
as 23-649
Plaintiff / Appellant: Jeffrey Schlosser
Defendant / Appellee: Hunchu Kwak, Judge, Individual Capacity, Kathleen McNamara, Judge, Individual Capacity, Ann Lynch, Judge, Individual Capacity and others
Defendant: Cornell Scott, Grant St Partnership, William Krahe, LCSW, Maura Fisher, APRN and others
Coffey v. Lancaster, City of et al
as 0:2023cv00917
Plaintiff: Anaysheon Coffey
Defendant: Lancaster, City of, Lancaster Police Department, City of, Scott Grant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Schlosser v. Kwak et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv00393
Defendant: Milton Walsh, William Krahe, Hunchu and others
Plaintiff: Jeffrey Schlosser
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grant v. United States of America
as 3:2015cv05715
Petitioner: Gregory Scott Grant
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Gregory Grant v. USA
as 12-35431
Petitioner - Appellant: GREGORY SCOTT GRANT
Respondent - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Grant v. United States of America We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2011cv05824
Petitioner: Gregory Scott Grant
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
GRANT VS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2007cv02109
Respondent: United States Of America
Petitioner: Gregory Scott Grant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
GRANT VS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2007cv00230
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner: GREGORY SCOTT GRANT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?