Cases 1 - 10 of 46
Dale Williams, Sr. v. Nancy Moore, et al
as 24-1419
Plaintiff:
Dale Williams, Sr.
Defendant:
Nancy Moore, Sara Kulas, MSOP--Moose Lake Group Supervisor Special Services, Samantha J. Suhonen, MSOP--Moose Lake mailroom personnel and others
Shannon v. Thacker et al
as 5:2023cv00060
Plaintiff:
Mark Shannon
Defendant:
Desirae Thacker, Parker CrayCraft, Helby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2022cv01905
Plaintiff:
James Scott Johnson
Defendant:
Oregon Department of Corrections, Josh Highberger, Marica G. Ventura and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Lumpkin
as 6:2022cv01005
Petitioner:
Anthony Scott Johnson
Respondent:
TDCJ Director Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Elmore v. Maries County, Missouri et al
as 4:2022cv00617
Plaintiff:
Linda Elmore
Defendant:
Victor Stratman, Ed Fagre, Doug Drewel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. United States of America
as 1:2022cv02149
Petitioner:
Bobby Scott Johnson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Johnson v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2019cv02293
Respondent:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Petitioner:
Anthony Scott Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johnson v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
as 2:2019cv00188
Respondent:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Petitioner:
Anthony Scott Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johnson v. T.D.C.J. Formby Unit et al
as 5:2019cv00068
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Scott Johnson
Defendant:
T.D.C.J. Formby Unit, Dennis NLN, Mrs. NFN Morallis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. USA
as 3:2017cv00080
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Aaron Scott Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
