Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 396
Settles v. Arkansas, State of
as 4:2024cv00492
Plaintiff: Quinton Settles
Defendant: Arkansas, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Settles v. Hudson
as 4:2024cv00258
Petitioner: Andrew Settles
Respondent: B Hudson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hopper v. Chancey et al
as 2:2024cv02040
Plaintiff: Danny Hopper
Defendant: Deputy Brandon Chancey, Former Prosecutor Rinda Baker, Prosecutor Kevin Holmes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gambaiani v. Green et al
as 3:2024cv03123
Plaintiff: Grant Gambaiani
Defendant: Brittany Green, Latoya Hughes, Kindell Kestner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Siraj Ibrihim v. Dewun Settle, et al
as 24-5258
Plaintiff: SIRAJ IBRIHIM, aka Robert J. Crain
Defendant: DEWUN R. SETTLE, WARDEN SHELBY COUNTY CORRECTIONS, U.S. MARSHALS SERVICE and others
Olden v. Avery et al
as 3:2024cv03079
Plaintiff: Terrance Olden
Defendant: Cameron Avery, Scott Jackson, . French and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mumin v. Case Manager Carroll et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2024cv00131
Plaintiff: Dukhan Mumin
Defendant: Case Manager Carroll, Shaun Settles, Case Worker Moeshoeshoe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Npimnee v. Settles
as 8:2024cv00130
Petitioner: Hope T. Npimnee
Respondent: Shaun Settles
Interested Party: Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mike Settle v. Vincent Vantell
as 24-5317
Plaintiff: MIKE SETTLE
Defendant: VINCENT VANTELL, Warden
Siraj Ibrihim v. Dewun Settle, et al
as 24-5302
Plaintiff: SIRAJ IBRIHIM, aka Robert J. Crain
Defendant: DEWUN R. SETTLE, WARDEN SHELBY COUNTY CORRECTIONS, U.S. MARSHALS SERVICE and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?