Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Simpson v. Butricks
as 3:2020cv01892
Petitioner:
Earl C. Simpson, III
Respondent:
Kenneth Butricks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Simpson v. West Virginia Regional Jail and Correctional Facility Authority et al
as 2:2017cv03069
Plaintiff:
John Simpson, III
Defendant:
West Virginia Regional Jail and Correctional Facility Authority , Channel, Stead and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crawford v. Suddaby et al
as 1:2016cv00246
Plaintiff:
Lawrence L. Crawford
Defendant:
G. Suddaby, Tohenberg, William Duffy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crawford v. Duffy et al
as 1:2015cv04005
Plaintiff:
Lawrence L. Crawford
Defendant:
William Duffy, The United States, Sharpe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crawford v. Duffy et al
as 1:2015cv02309
Plaintiff:
Lawrence L. Crawford
Defendant:
William Duffy, The United States, Sharpe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COOK et al v. JUDGE CHARLES R. SIMPSON III et al
as 3:2014cv06523
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY COOK, JOHN SUTCLIFFE, LAWRENCE L. CRAWFORD and others
Defendant:
JUDGE CHARLES R. SIMPSON III, JUDGE SHIPP and JUDGE JOHN G. HEYBURN II et al.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cook et al v. Simpson et al
as 3:2014cv00589
Plaintiff:
Anthony Cook, John E Sutcliffe and Jongh Gabriel Jahjgh T. Tishbite
Defendant:
Judge Simpson, III, Judge Shipp, The State of Kentucky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Essie Simpson, III v. John Marshall
as 12-55908
Petitioner - Appellant:
ESSIE SIMPSON, III
Respondent - Appellee:
JOHN MARSHALL
Essie Simpson, III v. John Marshall
as 2:2009cv01825
Petitioner:
Essie Simpson, III
Respondent:
John Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cobble v. Simpson et al
as 3:2008cv00668
Plaintiff:
Daniel Cobble
Defendant:
Charles R. Simpson, III and Mike Simpson
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
