Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Thomas Davis v. Brooks Goldsmith
as 23-7214
Plaintiff / Appellant:
REV. THOMAS LOUIS DAVIS
Defendant / Appellee:
BROOKS P. GOLDSMITH, Judge of Circuits Courts/Retired, RACHEL DEANGELIS, Asst. Solicitor/State Prosecutor, CHRISTIAN D. ANDERSON, Beaufort County Sheriff Dept. and others
Holmes v. Hewitt et al
as 9:2023cv04238
Plaintiff:
George Holmes
Defendant:
John M. Hewitt, Jeffrey Stephens, Courtney Ann Gibbes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davis v. Goldsmith et al
as 9:2023cv03059
Plaintiff:
Rev Thomas Louis Davis, Rev. Thomas L. Davis and Thomas L Davis
Defendant:
South Carolina, State of, Sherrif Officer Christian D. Anderson, Carmen T. Mullen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Huynh v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) et al
as 3:2018cv05670
Defendant:
P. Sullivan, C. Martella, Correction Officer Alamo and others
Plaintiff:
Tri Huu Huynh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Summers v. Harvey et al
as 1:2016cv02283
Plaintiff:
Melvin Summers, Jr.
Defendant:
A. C. Harvey, J. Haddad, Jeanne Canavan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Acosta et al
as 4:2013cv00363
Plaintiff:
Philip Noel Johnson
Defendant:
B Acosta, T Snodderly, T Mullen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Parmer v. Alander et al
as 2:2010cv00611
Plaintiff:
David Earl Parmer
Defendant:
K. Alander, CDC, G. A. Thumser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norsworthy v. Cate, et al
as 2:2009cv02989
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Bryan Norsworthy
Defendant:
Mathew Cate, Mike Knowles, Kathleen Dickinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas Davis v. Angela Tanner
as 08-8103
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS LOUIS DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
ANGELA MCCALL TANNER, KIMBERLY SMITH, Ex Solicitor, MCDUFFEY STONE, III, Head Solicitor and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
