Cases 1 - 10 of 46
Titus v. Omega Center
as 6:2024cv06056
Plaintiff:
Michael Titus
Defendant:
Double Tree Parking Garage, East End Towing, PPP Grants and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Titus v. Scarface, et al
as 24-1725
Plaintiff:
Michael Titus, ADC #168523
Defendant:
Scarface, Movie, Al Pacino, Director of Scarface, Keef Coff Group and others
Titus v. Double Tree Parking Garage et al
as 4:2024cv00277
Plaintiff:
Michael Titus
Defendant:
Double Tree Parking Garage, East End Towing, PPP Grants and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dupont v. Swaney
as 2:2024cv00041
Petitioner:
Omega Demetrius Dupont
Respondent:
G Swaney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Titus v Scarface et al
as 4:2024cv00235
Plaintiff:
Michael Titus
Defendant:
Scarface, Al Pacino, Keef Coff Group and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pettaway v. Butler et al
as 1:2024cv00027
Plaintiff:
Marcus Jermaine Pettaway
Defendant:
Butler, K. Henderson and Sergent Omega
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
KNIGHT v. COASTAL STATE PRISON et al
as 5:2023cv00494
Plaintiff:
ROBERT KNIGHT, JR
Defendant:
COASTAL STATE PRISON, OFFICER RENE MARTINEZ, OFFICER DAVID GAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Titus v. Malvern Nurses et al
as 6:2023cv06080
Plaintiff:
Michael Titus
Defendant:
John or Jane Doe Nurse, Malvern Nurses, Varner Unit Nurses and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
T.D. v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2023cv01199
Plaintiff:
T.D.
Defendant:
Arizona, State of and Douglas Omega Williams, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Temesgen v. Clark County Detention Center Medical Staff
as 2:2023cv00102
Plaintiff:
Omega Temesgen
Defendant:
Clark County Detention Center Medical Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
