Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Evans v. Jovanovich et al
as 6:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
Anthony Evans
Defendant:
Sam Jovanovich, Travis Jones and Kimberly Malcomb
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flesch v. Malcomb et al
as 6:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
Cody Joseph Vernon Flesch
Defendant:
Kimberly Malcomb, Travis Jones and Ray Hunt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Heidt et al
as 2:2023cv00121
Plaintiff:
Travis Jones
Defendant:
Jacqueline M Heidt, Warden Wells and Deputy Warden Melman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Knox County et al
as 4:2021cv04127
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Jones, Jeff Bosaw, Martae West and others
Defendant:
Knox County, Knox County Jail, Lou Glossip and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roach v. Tennessee Department of Justice et al
as 1:2020cv00031
Defendant:
Stella Hargrove, David Allen, Circuit Court of the 22nd Judicial District and others
Plaintiff:
Douglas Roberts Roach
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Semple et al
as 3:2017cv00994
Plaintiff:
Generio Travis Jones, Jr
Defendant:
Scott Semple, John Doe, Rivera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. United States of America
as 2:2013cv02428
Petitioner:
Travis Jones
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Tesch et al v. Martinez et al
as 2:2013cv00525
Plaintiff:
Gary Tesch, Brian Lassiter, Osie Fields and others
Defendant:
Susanna Martinez, Greg Mercantile, Jerry Roark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Warden, Noble Correctional Institution
as 2:2009cv00980
Petitioner:
Travis Jones
Respondent:
Warden, Noble Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Bell
as 2:2007cv13442
Petitioner:
Travis Jones
Respondent:
Thomas K Bell
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
