Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Nieves v. The New York State Ofice of Mental Health et al
as 1:2020cv09502
Defendant:
M.D. Robert Nadrich, The New York State Ofice of Mental Health, MD Dennis Popeo and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Nieves
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hillberry v. Elder et al
as 5:2013cv00113
Plaintiff:
Roy Franklin Hillberry, II
Defendant:
R. Elder, W. O. Stewart, Reta Mays and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hillberry v. Elder et al
as 2:2013cv21894
Plaintiff:
Roy Franklin Hillberry, II
Defendant:
R. Elder, W. O. Stewart, Reta Mays and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lopez v. Cobb County Government et al
as 1:2013cv01895
Plaintiff:
Jaime V. Lopez
Defendant:
Cobb County Government and Cobb County, Georgia
Lopez v. Craven et al
as 3:2013cv00142
Petitioner:
Adam V Lopez
Respondent:
Olivia Craven and T Carlin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lopez v. Craven et al
as 3:2013cv00143
Plaintiff:
Adam V Lopez
Defendant:
Olivia Craven, John Doe, John Doe I and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lopez v. Maricopa County Sheriff's Office et al
as 2:2013cv00518
Plaintiff:
Hector Rene V Lopez
Defendant:
Maricopa County Sheriff's Office , Joseph M Arpaio and Correctional Health Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Kinnamon v. Lopez et al
as 1:2012cv01155
Plaintiff:
Todd Kinnamon
Defendant:
V. Lopez, J. Guzman and Dever
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lopez v. Unknown Parties et al
as 2:2012cv00640
Plaintiff:
Hector Rene V Lopez
Defendant:
Unknown Parties and Maricopa County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. State of California et al
as 5:2011cv06715
Plaintiff:
Robert P. Smith, III
Defendant:
State of California, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, D. Castillo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
