Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Chandler v. Smith et al
as 3:2018cv00029
Plaintiff:
Buster Chandler
Defendant:
Aaron Smith, Rodney Ballard, Anna Valintine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gomez v. Semple et al
as 3:2017cv02085
Plaintiff:
Santiago Gomez
Defendant:
Scott Semple, Monica Rinaldi, Riley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harry Nail v. Officer Collado, et al
as 16-17048
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HARRY A. NAIL
Defendant - Appellee:
OFFICER COLLADO, Dade C.I., a.k.a. Nail A. Harry, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER LESTER, Dade C.I., CORRECTIONAL OFFICER VALINTINE, Dade C.I. and others
Brookins v. Valintine
as 1:2015cv03753
Plaintiff:
Bryant Larmonca Brookins
Defendant:
Valintine
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harry v. Collado et al
as 1:2015cv23036
Plaintiff:
Nail A. Harry
Defendant:
Collado, Lester, Valintine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Cooper et al v. Baker County Commissioner
as 3:2014cv01127
Plaintiff:
Anthony L. Cooper, Clive Nelson and M. Valintine
Defendant:
Baker County Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Salter v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2011cv00109
Plaintiff:
Robert Louis Salter, Jr
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, FNU Mulberry, FNU Caravajal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Malik Ihsan v. Timothy Wilkinson, et al
as 10-30283
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MALIK ALQADR IHSAN, also known as Roger Mayweather
Defendant - Appellee:
TIMOTHY WILKINSON, TIMOTHY MORGAN, DELMAR MAXWELL and others
Anthony Turner v. Yolo County, et al
as 09-15757
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY R.G. TURNER
Defendant - Appellee:
YOLO COUNTY, CITY OF WOODLAND, AVRID JOHNSON and others
Turner v. Yolo County et al
as 2:2007cv01861
Plaintiff:
Anthony R.G. Turner
Defendant:
Yolo County, City of Woodland, Avrid Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
