Cases 1 - 10 of 57
Franklin, II v. Medina Township Police et al.
as 1:2024cv00794
Plaintiff:
Vincent L. Franklin, II, Vince and Vinny
Defendant:
Medina Township Police and Officer E. Chaperlo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Hinninger et al
as 1:2023cv01217
Plaintiff:
Michael Robinson
Defendant:
David Hinninger, All Board of Trustees/All Members, Steve Conry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Hinninger et al
as 3:2023cv00746
Plaintiff:
Michael Robinson
Defendant:
David Hinninger, All Board of Trustees/All Members, Steve Conry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stinson et al v. Fulton County Jail et al
as 1:2023cv03050
Plaintiff:
Cyanco Nicholi Stinson, Samuel Vinnie, Raheem Reason and others
Defendant:
Fulton County Jail and Employees of Fulton County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROCK v. LIGGINS et al
as 2:2023cv00072
Plaintiff:
VINNIE ROCK
Defendant:
LONNIE LIGGINS, DERRIK MALONE and ANTONIO KIMBLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Norrod v. Core Civic et al
as 1:2023cv01034
Plaintiff:
Jared Alan Norrod
Defendant:
Core Civic, Vinnie Vantell, Korja Murphy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norrod v. Core Civic et al
as 3:2023cv00144
Plaintiff:
Jared Alan Norrod
Defendant:
Core Civic, Vinnie Vantell, Korja Murphy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aaron Bressi v. John Gembic, et al
as 22-2866
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AARON J. BRESSI
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN GEMBIC, MICHAEL P. TOOMEY, PETER KAY and others
Hines v. Ted et al
as 1:2022cv00193
Plaintiff:
Kevin L. Hines
Defendant:
Ted, Vinnie, Charlene and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brent v. Vantell
as 1:2022cv01005
Petitioner:
John Brent
Respondent:
Vinnie Vantell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
